|
AUGUST 2002 |
2002 Colorado Winter
Wheat
| |
Performance trial results help Colorado wheat producers make better variety decisions. Colorado State University conducts variety performance trials to obtain unbiased and reliable information for Colorado wheat producers to make better variety decisions. Good variety decisions can return millions of dollars to Colorado wheat producers. Although precipitation in late summer and early fall 2001 was not abundant, trials were seeded timely and wheat stand establishment was excellent at all trial locations. The 2001/2002 winter temperatures were moderate but most trial locations suffered from lack of winter precipitation and snow cover. At each dryland trial location south of I-70, dry winter conditions combined with moderately cold temperatures caused significant winter injury and in some cases, total trial abandonment (e.g., Sheridan Lake, Cheyenne Wells). The winter drought carried through spring and early summer. Cold night temperatures in mid- and late-May led to widespread late spring freeze damage, especially in Northeast Colorado along Highway 14. As if conditions were not bad enough already, some areas were severely affected by hail, including the Genoa variety trial location. Continued widespread and severe drought conditions, combined with several periods of damaging high temperatures, led to earlier-than-normal harvest and extremely low yields. Though widespread throughout eastern Colorado, drought conditions were more prolonged and severe in southeastern Colorado. In drought years like this, common dryland root rot often adversely affects yields-visible by sporadic 'white heads' in the field as was observed in many production fields and several trial locations. Insect pressure was low, but Russian wheat aphids could be found in some fields and may have caused slight yield reductions, especially along the Front Range. There was minimal yield loss to due wheat steak mosaic, high plains disease, or barley yellow dwarf virus. Stripe rust, which had been so severe in 2001, and leaf rust were present in relatively low levels in some irrigated fields after grain filling had commenced and probably had only small effects on yield. Our dryland winter wheat variety trial (UVPT) is a single uniform variety performance trial comprised of 60 entries grown at 10 locations. Of the 60 entries in this trial, approximately half are named varieties and the other half are experimental lines. In addition to CSU varieties and experimental lines, the trial included public varieties from Nebraska, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas, and private varieties from Cargill-Goertzen and AgriPro. Due to winter injury, drought, spring freeze, and hail, only five of the ten trial locations were successfully harvested. Two of the five trials, Walsh and Lamar, were extremely low-yielding and highly variable preventing reliable differentiation among entries. Plot yields at Bennett, Akron, and Julesburg were low but reasonably high enough to be used for wheat variety selection purposes. Akron, the best dryland trial location all spring, experienced a damaging hail storm the night before harvest that reduced yields 15-25% in some entries. A randomized complete block field design with three replicates is used in all trials. Dryland trials were seeded at 600,000 seeds per acre and planted in 12 inch-spaced rows, except Julesburg that was seeded in 9 inch-spaced rows. The authors wish to make special note of two wheat improvement programs that will affect variety selection for the coming year: CLEARFIELD* wheat and Hard White Wheat (HWW) varieties. CLEARFIELD* is a unique production system
comprised of herbicide-tolerant wheat varieties, Beyond herbicide
to manage problematic weed species, and a stewardship agreement with growers
to ensure the use of best management practices for system sustainability.
The first publicly-developed CLEARFIELD* winter wheat varieties to be
released in the U.S., 'Above' (from Colorado State University and marketed
by the Colorado Wheat Research Foundation) and 'AP502 CL' (marketed by
AgriPro Seeds, Berthoud, CO) are tolerant to Beyond herbicide for
use in the CLEARFIELD* wheat production system. More information on the CLEARFIELD* wheat production system can be obtained at the following websites: (CLEARFIELD
Wheat Fact Sheet as html) White Wheat varieties In the 2002 US Farm Bill, a three-year market incentive program was established
to foster development of US HWW production and markets. With the recent
development of HWW varieties well adapted for production in Colorado,
wheat producers now have an excellent opportunity to participate in a
concerted, market-expansion effort. The most promising of these HWW varieties
for production in Colorado include the following: More information concerning hard white wheat may be obtained at the following website: http://www.awwpa.com (website for the American White Wheat Producers Association) The authors encourage wheat producers to make use of the "Decision Tree for Winter Wheat Variety Selection in Colorado" because it reflects our synthesis of data and field observations over years and locations. Because this year provided so little information to aid variety selection, we think growers should rely on variety performance data acquired in more normal years. Unfortunately, some varieties were being tested for the first time in 2002 and there is just too little information to make sound recommendations. Producers are also encouraged to spread the variety decision risk by planting two or more varieties. The average performance over two or three years is a proven tool for yield performance evaluation but producers should be mindful of other variety characteristics, like maturity, height, disease and insect resistance, quality characteristics, and winter hardiness, that influence variety adaptation, performance, and marketing options. | ||
|
Colorado State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Colorado counties cooperating. Cooperative Extension programs are available to all without discriminatin. The information given herein is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by Colorado State University Cooperative Extension is implied. | |
|
|
||
| |
||